Verdict: 'Good and memorable' is a wish, not a brief — you've described every name ever made and ruled out exactly none.
see the specimen they pasted
Give me some options for naming my new productivity app, with the pros and cons of each, and make sure they're good and memorable.
“give me some options”
'Some' is doing the laziest possible job here — it could mean 3 names or 30, and the model will pick a number at random, probably landing on a listicle of 10 forgettable syllables.
swap: 'some options' → 'exactly 5 name options'
Always pin the count when you want a list — 'some' gets you whatever the model felt like that day.
“make sure they're good and memorable”
'Good and memorable' is the naming equivalent of 'make it pop' — it rules out nothing, defines nothing, and the model will nod along and hand you whatever it was going to anyway.
swap: 'good and memorable' → 'short (1–2 syllables preferred), easy to spell, and domain-available-sounding'
Replace every adjective that a bad name could technically satisfy — 'good' and 'memorable' qualify for everything; spell out the actual constraints.
“naming my new productivity app”
'Productivity app' covers a Pomodoro timer, a team wiki, an AI task manager, and a habit tracker — the model has no idea which flavor of productivity you're building, so it'll vomit generic 'Flow' and 'Focus' compounds at you.
add: one sentence describing what the app does, who it's for, and the tone you want (e.g. 'a task manager for solo freelancers; tone: calm and professional, not hustle-culture')
Name the user and the vibe before asking for names — without them, every suggestion is a coin flip between generic and worse.
“pros and cons of each”
'Pros and cons' with no shape means you'll get a freeform paragraph per name — sometimes two bullets, sometimes eight, with no consistent lens to compare them on.
add: 'for each name give: 2 pros and 2 cons, covering memorability, spelling risk, and brand fit'
When you ask for structured comparison, define the axes — otherwise each entry gets graded on a different rubric and the comparison is useless.
You are a brand strategist specializing in SaaS product naming. Task: Generate exactly 5 name options for a productivity app with the following profile: - What it does: [one sentence — e.g. 'a task manager that helps solo freelancers batch their work into focused sessions'] - Target user: [e.g. 'freelancers, solopreneurs, or remote knowledge workers'] - Tone: [e.g. 'calm and professional — no hustle-culture energy, no ALL-CAPS aggression'] - Hard constraints: names must be 1–2 syllables preferred, easy to spell on first hearing, and plausible as a .com domain For each name, return: - The name (bold) - 2 pros — covering memorability and brand fit - 2 cons — covering spelling risk and potential conflicts - One-line verdict: who this name is best for Do not pad with explanations. Return only the 5 entries in the format above. No intro, no outro.
/roast/example/no-format-contract