- PROJECT
- TheTank.io — an AI research & build platform
- CREDITS
- $thousands burned on v0, Cursor, Claude
- RE-ROLLS
- Hundreds. Each one a wish, not a brief.
- SHIPPED
- Yes. The tool works.
- REVENUE
- $0.00
I builtTheTank.It cost thousands.Meerkat is what I wish I'd had.
An honest story about credits I burned, a tool that worked but didn't pay, and the prompt I should have written on turn one.
fig. 01 — the founder's receipt
I spent months building an AI tool with v0, Cursor, and Claude — a research and build platform for founders. The idea was good. The execution should have been faster than it was. Instead I watched my credit meter tick down every time I asked for something the model couldn't quite hear, and every time I had to re-roll the same generation because my prompt was a wish instead of a brief.
By the time it shipped I had spent thousands on credits and hadn't made a dime back. The tool works. The math doesn't. The reason — and I sat with this for a long time before I admitted it — wasn't the AI. It was that nobody, including me, was good at telling the AI what we actually wanted.
Engineers, designers, marketers, support leads, founders — everyone whose job lives near a model is becoming a prompt writer, whether they signed up for it or not. Meerkat exists so the next person doesn't learn that lesson the same way I did. You bring the idea or the draft. Meerkat asks the questions a senior editor would have asked. You walk out with a clean prompt that does the job on turn one instead of turn eight.

Every Meerkat specimen is reviewed by a panel of leading models, then synthesized into a single output. Disagreement becomes the editor's red pen. No invented facts about your domain — if a field is missing, Meerkat asks.
●panel-reviewed · 3 models